<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: End of PageRank. What comes next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html</link>
	<description>Read, learn and share.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joyce Babu - MyBlogLog</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce Babu - MyBlogLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-573</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] more changes.. Topics: analytics, local analytics, Programming, Wordpress, wordpress analytics   End of PageRank. What comes next? - 6 days ago For the past few weeks, blogosphere is teeming with posts on Google and its latest [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[&#8230;] more changes.. Topics: analytics, local analytics, Programming, Wordpress, wordpress analytics   End of PageRank. What comes next? - 6 days ago For the past few weeks, blogosphere is teeming with posts on Google and its latest [&#8230;]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-572</guid>
		<description>A post on Matt Cutt's blog (almost an year back), hinted that Google will be taking steps to ensure that PageRank does not flow through sponsored links, even if the the linking page has high PR. In such a situation the only consideration for advertisers will be the site's traffic.

I won't blame Google for being strict about PR. It is the base of their search results ranking algorithm and they should try to improve it and prevent foul plays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A post on Matt Cutt&#8217;s blog (almost an year back), hinted that Google will be taking steps to ensure that PageRank does not flow through sponsored links, even if the the linking page has high PR. In such a situation the only consideration for advertisers will be the site&#8217;s traffic.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t blame Google for being strict about PR. It is the base of their search results ranking algorithm and they should try to improve it and prevent foul plays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Page rank is waning in power. It is only a valuable concept if people reply on it, give it creedance. As more and more advertisers and publishers are moving away from using PR as an indicator, we see more of a focus on traffic.

Page Rank is a fallen god in many ways, jealous of its subjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page rank is waning in power. It is only a valuable concept if people reply on it, give it creedance. As more and more advertisers and publishers are moving away from using PR as an indicator, we see more of a focus on traffic.</p>
<p>Page Rank is a fallen god in many ways, jealous of its subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Google may continue to use PageRank for ranking websites. But I don't think webmasters are going to give the old importance to PR anymore.

Almost all are running websites for money. If advertisors asks for dofollow links, then most of the webmasters will be willing to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may continue to use PageRank for ranking websites. But I don&#8217;t think webmasters are going to give the old importance to PR anymore.</p>
<p>Almost all are running websites for money. If advertisors asks for dofollow links, then most of the webmasters will be willing to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StumbleUpon &#187; Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>StumbleUpon &#187; Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-518</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[&#8230;] Your page is on StumbleUpon [&#8230;]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-505</guid>
		<description>I don't think either PageRank is dead. It is just transforming. It is sorting out and filtering web sites. It does made some mistakes, but lots of them (i.e. PageRank wrong decreases) have been fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think either PageRank is dead. It is just transforming. It is sorting out and filtering web sites. It does made some mistakes, but lots of them (i.e. PageRank wrong decreases) have been fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: critical critic</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>critical critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I seriously doubt PageRank is dead.  The algorithm has just been further adjusted to account for paid links.  Hopefully it will get webmasters back to the notion that good, quality sites get rewarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously doubt PageRank is dead.  The algorithm has just been further adjusted to account for paid links.  Hopefully it will get webmasters back to the notion that good, quality sites get rewarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Many people like CopyBlogger have increased their traffic by talking about the lost PR. But still I would prefer the PR as it is a better investment.

What I don't like about Google is that almost all their services are entirely dependant on webmasters, and still they are acting against us. Adsense, Analytics, Search Engine etc are dependant on our websites. Unfortunately, they know very well that webmasters won't unite and stand against them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people like CopyBlogger have increased their traffic by talking about the lost PR. But still I would prefer the PR as it is a better investment.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t like about Google is that almost all their services are entirely dependant on webmasters, and still they are acting against us. Adsense, Analytics, Search Engine etc are dependant on our websites. Unfortunately, they know very well that webmasters won&#8217;t unite and stand against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert MacEwan</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert MacEwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-469</guid>
		<description>My traffic has exploded since around the time my PR started going down. The result of better content and networking with others. Now with PayPerPost rolling out Argus I'm much less concerned with my PR, which by the way was at 6 for years.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
itâ€™s harder for search engines to know which links can be trusted. - Matt Cutts
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don't get me wrong I love Google, but with comments like the above and seeing their stock hit $700 a share It is quite obvious money bloggers are getting hit.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
At this point, someone usually asks me: â€œBut canâ€™t you just not count the bad links? On the dailycal.org, I see the words â€˜Sponsored Resourcesâ€™. Canâ€™t search engines detect paid links?â€ Yes, Google has a variety of algorithmic methods of detecting such links, and they work pretty well. But these links make it harder for Google (and other search engines) to determine how much to trust each link. A lot of effort is expended that could be otherwise be spent on improving core quality (relevance, coverage, freshness, etc.). &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Excuse me but I've had this page online since 2000. If after 7 years you don't trust my site then screw you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My traffic has exploded since around the time my PR started going down. The result of better content and networking with others. Now with PayPerPost rolling out Argus I&#8217;m much less concerned with my PR, which by the way was at 6 for years.</p>
<blockquote><p>
itâ€™s harder for search engines to know which links can be trusted. - Matt Cutts
</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong I love Google, but with comments like the above and seeing their stock hit $700 a share It is quite obvious money bloggers are getting hit.</p>
<blockquote><p>
At this point, someone usually asks me: â€œBut canâ€™t you just not count the bad links? On the dailycal.org, I see the words â€˜Sponsored Resourcesâ€™. Canâ€™t search engines detect paid links?â€ Yes, Google has a variety of algorithmic methods of detecting such links, and they work pretty well. But these links make it harder for Google (and other search engines) to determine how much to trust each link. A lot of effort is expended that could be otherwise be spent on improving core quality (relevance, coverage, freshness, etc.). </p></blockquote>
<p>Excuse me but I&#8217;ve had this page online since 2000. If after 7 years you don&#8217;t trust my site then screw you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googlebot Just Got The Boot. &#124; My Affiliate Journey - Affiliate Marketing Blog by Vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Googlebot Just Got The Boot. &#124; My Affiliate Journey - Affiliate Marketing Blog by Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joycebabu.com/blog/end-of-pagerank-what-comes-next.html#comment-468</guid>
		<description>[...] would not call it an attempt to boycott Google. However, since Google has considered some of the pages to be shown on the first page of its search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] would not call it an attempt to boycott Google. However, since Google has considered some of the pages to be shown on the first page of its search [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
